Trying AI tools on the jobs already on your list

Pulenaz: a checklist with one detail missing

Pulenaz has notes for a community event scattered across a page: volunteers need water, chairs arrive Friday, and the event itself is on Saturday. She asks Claude to turn the notes into a checklist. The first answer is tidy, but it leaves out the Friday chair delivery and gives the Saturday event a start time that was never in her notes. She keeps the original beside the answer so the missing line and the invented time are easy to spot.

She asks again, this time requesting a separate line for each delivery and telling the tool to mark unknown details instead of filling them in. The revised list includes the chairs and leaves the start time open. She keeps that checklist, crosses out a repeated water reminder and makes a note to ask about the time herself. The useful result is not that the tool has organized the whole event: it has given her a first pass she can check against the page she already has.

Watching the two requests side by side shows her learning what to ask for. The first answer saves her some sorting, but creates a new checking job; the second gives her a better starting point without answering the question she still needs to ask a person.

iJustine: a caption that needs a human edit

iJustine starts with notes for a short video about rearranging a desk: she moved the lamp, made room for a notebook and tried the new setup for an afternoon. She asks Claude for a short caption. The first version adds that the change took ten minutes, although her notes say nothing about how long it took. She leaves the notes visible beside the draft, removes the time claim and asks for a shorter version that sticks to the supplied details.

The next caption gives her a usable opening, but she changes its upbeat last line to sound more like her and decides which detail to keep. She would use a draft for this small job again, while still checking every concrete claim before publishing. In the video, the pause over that invented ten minutes is more revealing than a polished final caption: writing the first sentence has become quicker, while reviewing and choosing the words remain her work.

What the tool offers

Claude’s help center describes drafting text, summarizing material and brainstorming as things the tool can help with. Those functions make it possible to start with notes and ask for a different form, such as a checklist or a short draft.

References: Anthropic

Choose a trial to watch

Start with Pulenaz if you want to see a learner refine a request and keep an unanswered question visible. Choose iJustine for a quicker writing task where the interesting moment is deciding which fluent words deserve to stay. Both begin with ordinary material rather than a product announcement, and both show the decision after the first answer.

Sources and attribution

1. Anthropic

   What are some things I can use Claude for?Published Mar 16, 2026 · Recorded Oct 30, 2026