Summary
A year of switching on a lamp and a practical call test reveal when the cheap option is worth keeping and when it gets in the way.
Creators on this page
- Pulenaz
Reviews an inexpensive smart plug after a year of ordinary use.
- Pokimane
Tests inexpensive wireless earbuds on a call against a wired pair.
Account sources: Pulenaz on Instagram (@pulenaz) · Pulenaz on Telegram (@pulenaz)
Reference table
Download CSVThe table scrolls horizontally on smaller screens.
| Device and job | Problem found | What she kept using |
|---|---|---|
| Budget smart plug: turn on a lamp | After a network reset the app could not reach it until reconnection | Pulenaz kept the evening schedule after a year; used the physical switch for the nearer lamp |
| Inexpensive wireless earbuds: make a call | Fan noise made the call harder for the other person to follow | Pokimane kept them for quiet calls and chose wired in a noisy room |
Pulenaz: does the plug earn its place?
Pulenaz bought an inexpensive smart plug for a lamp and was not sure an app was an improvement over reaching for the switch. She set an evening schedule and used it for a year, changing the time when the evenings grew lighter. Her review returns to the actual job: the lamp comes on at the set time and she can switch it off from the sofa without crossing the room.
The year also includes a frustrating evening after her home network was reset. The app could not reach the plug until she connected it again, so the quick remote switch became a setup task. She shows the lamp working from the app after reconnecting it, then tries the schedule again on the next evening. It comes on as planned.
She keeps the plug for this lamp because the recurring schedule saves a small daily task, but stops using the app for a lamp beside her chair: its ordinary switch is already within reach. Her verdict is neither that every lamp needs a smart plug nor that the first connection problem made the experiment useless. The useful test is whether this particular job got easier over time.
Pokimane: the inexpensive earbuds on an actual call
Pokimane wants a cheap pair of wireless earbuds for calls without a cable catching on her desk. She tries them for a short call and asks the other person to describe what they can hear. Sitting still, her voice comes through clearly; when she turns toward a fan, the other person says the background is distracting. Still turned toward the fan, she repeats the same short sentence on a wired pair from the same seat, with the same person listening.
The wired pair makes her voice easier for the other person to follow in that comparison, while the wireless pair is more comfortable for moving around the room. She tries moving away from the fan and calls back: the wireless conversation is clearer. She keeps the cheap earbuds for quiet calls and uses the wired pair when the room is noisy, instead of declaring the low price either a bargain for everything or proof that they are useless.
Where to start
Start with Pulenaz for the longer question of whether a new convenience survives a year of use and an annoying interruption. Choose Pokimane for a quick, repeatable test of whether cheap technology does the job that matters to her.
Cite this page
Creator Figures. "Trying inexpensive technology with a reason to doubt it." Published Oct 30, 2026. https://creatorfigures.com/articles/women-skeptical-but-practical-tests-of-new-technology/